went through a period of transformation that caused a rash?

I am a Tantrica who has delved so deep into the self that my body is responding with intense rashes very often and to subtle shifts in eating....right after coming back from Tantra initiations and transformations.

Does anyone know any book to recommend on the ascension process of saints or Ascended Masters?

looking for more knowledge on this....
Om, Astarte.
posted by:
Asttarte
Philadelphia
  • You many find this book of interest: WOMEN OF POWER AND GRACE by Timothy Conway. In a chapter on Hazrat Babajan, an incredible mystic who was an Afgani Muslim princess who left home and studied with Muslim and Hindu teachers and lived to be over 120 years old --- Timothy recounts "Her physical condition was unstable---one day she would be running a high fever, the next day she would be fine. It was commonly thought that Babjan took on the psychic impurities of her visitors, "burning" them off as intense sensations in her own body..."

    "Babajan wore some tight rings on her fingers (probably given by her parents in her youth), and once a wound opened up on a finger on her left hand. Gangrene set in and maggots infested it. Babajan, far from being alarmed, happily let these "children" feed off the flesh. The finger finally fell off! As with everything, she saw this as part of God's "wonderful game." ... Babajan, in her completely awakened state, could, with total detachment, peacefully watch and feel the entire movie superimposed on the screen of pure, infinite, almighty Consciousness. This, surely, must be the secret of such fantastic equanimity that we find in the lives of Babajan and certain other fully awakened mystics."

    This book is one of my favorites -- you can get it from Amazon, or from the Wake Up Press at Timothy's website www.enlightened-spirituality.org

    Jai Maa!
    Lily
    • > Babajan, in her completely awakened state, could, with total detachment, peacefully watch and feel the entire movie superimposed on the screen of pure, infinite, almighty Consciousness.
      *****
      Once again, hagiography demolishes the truth and self-realization takes a nose-dive into the mud of superstitious nonsense.
      • I don't know how that particular quote really propogates that. I just had a friend hang herself (yeah, another tragedy, yay, right?) and I am doing a half assed job of exactly that. I'm falling in love with the feelings of grief that are spilling through me - because it's all Ma. I've been going through some major turmoil and I am slowly trying to work out the blocks that are keeping me from complete acceptance... not just of my friend's death, but my sister is in the middle of a possible cancerous situation, my ex is worried I have brain cancer because I have the same symptoms as one of our friends (and her ex) did before she died, and my girlfriend's job is threatening to wreck her emotionally so it is spilling over into our relationship.

        I am looking at this and untying knots that are keeping me from loving all that shit as manifestations of Kali, ALONG with all the good stuff like parties and booty and dancing, etc...

        I want to be at a point where I could watch my finger rot off and beam fucking love for the Mother at it.
        • > I don't know how that particular quote really propogates that.
          *****
          It propagates the idea that enlightenment renders one an uncritical idiot who doesn't care about anything.

          >I want to be at a point where I could watch my finger rot off and beam fucking love for the Mother at it.
          *****
          Not to make light of your personal situations at this time, but a pre-frontal lobotomy would probably do the trick nicely.

          The fact is that these kinds of stories are myths which have propagated through time, propelled by the tendency of spiritual types to believe anything that gets shoved down their throats. I'm sure Babajan was an awesome individual who inspired many, but it's just as likely that she suffered from a nervous disorder that prevented her from feeling pain as it was the fact of her enlightenment which allowed her to watch her finger drop off.

          The bottom line is that self-realization is a recognition of an EXISTING state, not a new one. Anything you get from self-realization you have RIGHT NOW, regardless of whether this has been noticed or not. The Magic Gift Bag From God theory of enlightenment, while sickeningly prevalent, is straight-up, unmitigated bullshit and the biggest impediment to realization that God has ever devised.

          This is a group about Ramakrishna. He's regarded as the pre-eminent saint of the last 100 or so years. Look at how much he suffered through his throat cancer. Enlightenment is no guarantee of anything save the direct and experiential understanding of your own nature as the Self. The body is still the body and will behave like a body, including experiencing severe pain just as Ramakrishna did during his illness just before his mahasamadhi.

          I'm not trying to be mean and belittle what you and your friends are going through, Saul. These are the things that suck about life. I'm just not convinced – based on my research into the real lives of saints and my knowledge of the lives of realizers I know personally – that realization gets you out of suffering. It gets you out of being the one who suffers, but as long as there's a body, there's going to be suffering, short of some kind of mental illness that prevents the perception of pain, hagiographic representations to the contrary notwithstanding.
          • naw, we're not realy at odds, dude - I am not talking about running away from suffering, I am talking about accepting that pain and suffering as Being.

            but hey, it's all hagiographies about RK really, except for Kripal; so I dunno how he really dealt with that cancer.
            • > it's all hagiographies about RK really, except for Kripal; so I dunno how he really dealt with that cancer.
              *****
              Hagiographies aren't completely fictional. They are usually comprised of historical fact mixed with myth. I find it easy to believe that he suffered through his throat cancer based on the description in the Kathamirta. It became hagiography only after it was translated (and bowdlerized) by Nikhilananda for the Western reader.
              • you don't think that it was ALREADY hagiographical for a Bengali audience tho, just to a lesser extent?

                As soon as I can read Bangla the Kathamrita is definitely number one on my "to-read" list (once I get past comic books and children's stories... "See Bhaskar run! Run Bhaskar, run!"
                • > you don't think that it was ALREADY hagiographical for a Bengali audience tho, just to a lesser extent?
                  *****
                  Actually, Gupta was rather honest in the Bengali Kathamirta. It was the bowdlerized and omitted passages of RK's "secret talk", done by Nikhilananda, that became the basis of Kripal's thesis.

                  I think it can be spun hagiographically by anyone with an agenda to save their view of the pristine RK. There is another word for that: denial.

Recent topics in "Sri Ramakrishna"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Ramakrishna and the Shankaracharyas Austin 2 July 3, 2008
KUNDALINI SHAKTI Yogi madan 1 April 16, 2008
Bengali Speakers? Matt 0 December 11, 2007
analysing WORDS OF RAMAKRISHNA. Atul (Atulyam) 9 December 10, 2007